The Malaysiakini Decision: Liability of Online Intermediary Platforms for Third-Party Content

On 19 February 2021, the Federal Court in the case of Peguam Negara Malaysia v Mkini Dotcom Sdn Bhd & Another (Case No. 08(L)-4-06/2020) held in a 6-1 decision that Mkini Dot Com Sdn Bhd, the owner and operator of the Malaysian online news portal ‘Malaysiakini’ (“Malaysiakini”), was liable for contempt of court in relation to third-party comments that were posted on Malaysiakini’s website. The majority decision found Malaysiakini responsible for the third-party comments on its website based on section 114A(1) of the Evidence Act 1950 (“EA 1950”), which raises the legal presumption that Malaysiakini, as the news portal owner, was the publisher of the said comments. The editor of Malaysiakini, however, was found not guilty of publication of the comments. The Federal Court’s decision may have serious ramifications on the liability of online intermediary platforms for third party content moving forward. This Update therefore seeks to provide a brief analysis on the summary grounds of decision for both the majority and minority decisions of the Federal Court, pending the issuance of the full grounds of judgment.

For more information, click here to read the full Legal Update.

CONTACTS

Partner, Head of Technology, Media & Telecommunications and Data Privacy & Protection
T +603 2273 1919
Malaysia,
Partner
+60 3 2273 1919 / +60 3 2267 2674
Malaysia,
Partner
T +603 2273 1919 / D +603 2267 2750
Malaysia,
Partner
+60 3 2273 1919 / +60 3 2267 2703
Malaysia,

Country

EXPERTISE

Share